LR: I’m not sure I understand. It’s perhaps better that I don’t.
++++++++++++++++++
Great position for an academic to take. Writing the usual RW/usa brainwashing crap you do about Mao makes one wonder how such folks ever get to be academics.
Love this. I do wonder, this sounds like it was totally optional for you, were you having a moment of masochism?
Certainly these kids of seminars are absurd and offered and run by non-serious people. If one is not obliged to attend, why would anyone (unless it was masochism as stated or research?).
My sense is that the stupider these things become, and more abstract from normal life and its demands, the entire university will go into decline as the market for BS declines, and so will these idiot programs.
STILL, as always, zero rational thought, zero rational discussion, zero empathy for your fellow human beings. Please do not try to tell us that you are advancing the ludicrous notion that you and all the other low lifes "believe" there have never been been bisexual [...] people in all of history.
You know that is a totally delusional position, which you, being a trumper, almost certainly will flee from.
A fellow who tells his audiences to straighten their shoulders and clean up their rooms is talking somewhat "fluffy" morality. Granted!
But one could not logically describe such banal moral advice as "lies obfuscation, sneaky or underhanded" sorts of fluff. You describe yourself as "tall dark and handsome", yet do not provide a suitable photograph. So are you tall dark and handsome compared to a pale 6 inch tall leprechaun hiding under a large toad stool in the hills of County Wicklow overlooking Dublin Ireland's smog?
You have been studying 9-11 for 23 years! That's concentration, but fairly narrow in scope. Even though you may prefer to slouch and eschew making your bed or housecleaning, given an obsession with one day, you could broaden your horizons by realizing that Peterson's OUGHTS [You ought to straighten your posture and clean up your room.] cannot be refuted by any sort of IS statement, such as "Peterson IS a liar." By saying such things you simply prove that your judgment of Peterson is more applicable to yourself.
LR: I’m not sure I understand. It’s perhaps better that I don’t.
++++++++++++++++++
Great position for an academic to take. Writing the usual RW/usa brainwashing crap you do about Mao makes one wonder how such folks ever get to be academics.
Love this. I do wonder, this sounds like it was totally optional for you, were you having a moment of masochism?
Certainly these kids of seminars are absurd and offered and run by non-serious people. If one is not obliged to attend, why would anyone (unless it was masochism as stated or research?).
My sense is that the stupider these things become, and more abstract from normal life and its demands, the entire university will go into decline as the market for BS declines, and so will these idiot programs.
STILL, as always, zero rational thought, zero rational discussion, zero empathy for your fellow human beings. Please do not try to tell us that you are advancing the ludicrous notion that you and all the other low lifes "believe" there have never been been bisexual [...] people in all of history.
You know that is a totally delusional position, which you, being a trumper, almost certainly will flee from.
ambidextrous
adj.
gynandrous
adj.
#relations
ambisexual
adj.
cross-sexual
adj.
trans-sexual
adj.
queer
monoecious
adj.
monoclinous
adj.
#relations
pansexual
omnisexual
swinging both ways
gay
adj., n.
#sexuality
gynandromorphic
pseudohermaphrodite
gynandromorphous
dioecious
homosexual
gynandromorph
hermaphrodites
n.
#organ
double-gaited
adj.
bisexuals
swings both ways
adj.
#relations
androgenous
hits both ways
homoecious
pseudohermaphroditic
transgender
transsexual
adj., n.
bisexed
omnifutuent
adj.
polysexual
heteroflexible
transvestite
adj.
bi-guy
homoerotic
sexless
adj.
dual-gendered
intersex individual
switch-hitting
adj.
amphigamous
non-binary
bicurious
non-monosexual
bisexuality
You "dined" with Jordan Peterson?!!! When will the podcast be? What will you discuss?
With Jordan P, obviously it will be totally inane JP lies, obfuscation, sneaky, underhanded fluff. Contradictory nonsense.
A fellow who tells his audiences to straighten their shoulders and clean up their rooms is talking somewhat "fluffy" morality. Granted!
But one could not logically describe such banal moral advice as "lies obfuscation, sneaky or underhanded" sorts of fluff. You describe yourself as "tall dark and handsome", yet do not provide a suitable photograph. So are you tall dark and handsome compared to a pale 6 inch tall leprechaun hiding under a large toad stool in the hills of County Wicklow overlooking Dublin Ireland's smog?
You have been studying 9-11 for 23 years! That's concentration, but fairly narrow in scope. Even though you may prefer to slouch and eschew making your bed or housecleaning, given an obsession with one day, you could broaden your horizons by realizing that Peterson's OUGHTS [You ought to straighten your posture and clean up your room.] cannot be refuted by any sort of IS statement, such as "Peterson IS a liar." By saying such things you simply prove that your judgment of Peterson is more applicable to yourself.